Introduction:

Perception, the process by which we acquire knowledge and understanding of the world around us, has long captivated the minds of philosophers. It serves as the lens through which we interpret and make sense of our experiences. Throughout the history of philosophical inquiry, scholars have grappled with the fundamental question of the source of perception. Two major schools of thought have emerged, each offering distinct perspectives on the nature and origins of our perceptions: rational philosophers and sensory philosophers. Rational philosophers emphasize the role of reason and intellect in shaping our perceptions, highlighting the potential fallibility of our senses. On the other hand, sensory philosophers prioritize the direct sensory experience as the primary source of knowledge. This article seeks to delve into the philosophical conflict between these two contrasting opinions, exploring their key tenets and implications. In doing so, we aim to unravel the complex interplay between reason and sensory input in the formation of our perceptions. At the heart of this exploration lies the question: Which of these perspectives offers a more valid explanation of the source of perception?